Papers with extraction method
Improving Evidence Detection by Leveraging Warrants (D19-66)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for extracting warrants from a corpus of arguments are lacking in argument detection. |
| Approach: | They propose to extract multiple warrants from an existing corpus of arguments and then aggregate them . they show that the method needs to be improved, but that it can still improve evidence detection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can improve the performance of evidence detection by analyzing arguments and aggregating them. |
Salience-Aware Event Chain Modeling for Narrative Understanding (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Storytelling is the communication of interesting and related events that form a concrete process. |
| Approach: | They propose methods for extracting the principal chain from natural language text . they filter away non-salient events and supportive sentences to isolate them . authors propose novel methods for predicting and answering events from text based on event-based temporal question answering . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves narrative prediction and event-based temporal question answering tasks. |
Generation and Extraction Combined Dialogue State Tracking with Hierarchical Ontology Integration (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current models are not satisfactory for solving out-of-vocabulary problems . current models assume that the task ontology is well defined in advance . |
| Approach: | They propose to enhance the interrelation between slots with masked hierarchical attention. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model yields a significant performance gain over current state-of-the-art model and is more robust to out-ofvocabulary problem compared with other methods. |
Interpretability for Morphological Inflection: from Character-level Predictions to Subword-level Rules (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural models for morphological inflection have recently attained very high results, but their interpretation remains challenging. |
| Approach: | They propose a linguistically-motivated variant to the encoder-decoder model with attention that incorporates a character-level cross-attention mechanism and a self-attention module over substrings of the input. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on three typologically-different languages and is highly interpretable. |